Hard vs soft constraints

This forum includes discussion about project risk analysis and risk management theory: Monte Carlo simulations, Event Chain Methodology, schedule and cost risk analysis. Please submit questions and case studies about your experience with our project risk analysis software.

Moderator: Intaver Support

Post Reply
Fred45
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:04 am

Hard vs soft constraints

Post by Fred45 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:39 pm

I have heard that you shouldn’t use constraints such as Must Start On or Must Finish On. My project has many of these and I would prefer not to remove them

Intaver Support
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:55 am

Re: Hard vs soft constraints

Post by Intaver Support » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:41 pm

As a general rule, you should avoid using hard constraints unless for very specific reasons as they do not allow the project’s activities to update properly when changes are made to the schedule. This is especially important in Monte Carlo simulations because that is exactly what we are trying to measure, what will happen if some activities are delayed , take longer than planned, or alternatively start early or take less time. If you use hard constraints, you may end up with an artificially more optimistic result than you would have otherwise.

In the example below, even though both activities have the exact same estimates, because of the hard constraint, the first task appears to have less variance or risk which may not reflect reality.

Image

There are cases in which hard constraints are justified. The case may be that a hard deadline exists for access to a testing facility or a launch window. These are “real world” constraints and sometimes and can be used if your team believes it is useful, though there are other methods, such as using deadlines with the Success Rate view that provide the same ability to measure the probability of meeting a hard deadline, without the use of hard constraints. In the example below, the Success Rate view shows that the activity has only an 18% chance of finishing before a set deadline.

Image
Intaver Support Team
Intaver Institute Inc.
Home of Project Risk Management and Project Risk Analysis software RiskyProject
www.intaver.com

Intaver Support
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:55 am

Re: Hard vs soft constraints

Post by Intaver Support » Sun Mar 25, 2018 9:47 am

When you import schedule from Microsoft Project, you can relax some constrains. To do it click on File -> Import -> Map Microsoft Project Fields -> Advanced Mapping -> Change Constrains during import.
Intaver Support Team
Intaver Institute Inc.
Home of Project Risk Management and Project Risk Analysis software RiskyProject
www.intaver.com

Intaver Support
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:55 am

Re: Hard vs soft constraints

Post by Intaver Support » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:44 am

Please be very careful with relaxing some constraints during import files from other scheduling software because it may cause incompatibility between schedules in RiskyProject and other scheduling software.
Intaver Support Team
Intaver Institute Inc.
Home of Project Risk Management and Project Risk Analysis software RiskyProject
www.intaver.com

Post Reply